28-1-2 The Priority of Nonviolence and a Minimal-Casualty Strategy: Not Presupposing the Rulers’ Restraint Item · PG-C
ID CH-028.1.2 · This item: 2 packages, five fixed folders each.
This item compares the legal sources, institutional design, participating actors, conditions of implementation, civilian risk, opposing views, and public authorization of “the right to life, the priority of nonviolence, and the principle of minimum harm”; any provisional power must be time-limited, subject to oversight, correctable, and terminable through an exit mechanism.
Knowledge packages
📦 CH-028.1.2.1 28-1-2-1 The Right to Life, the Priority of Nonviolence, and the Principle of Minimal Harm: Sources of Law, Comparative Experience, and Institutional Proposals
5 folders
📦 CH-028.1.2.2 28-1-2-2 The Right to Life, the Priority of Nonviolence, and the Principle of Minimal Harm: Conditions of Implementation, Protection of Civilians, Risks, and Democratic Authorization
5 folders
On this record:
💬 Comment⚖ Judge★ Rate＋ Corroborate✕ Rebut✎ CorrectRatings use the ten-dimension rubric with human sign-off. Comments, judgments, corroborations, rebuttals, and corrections first receive a receipt and enter the pending queue; they are stored only after review (never written directly to the official database — Red Line 1).