21-1-2-2 The Sino-Japanese Treaty of Peace and Friendship: Implementation, Harm to Victims, Chains of Responsibility, and Disputed Counter-Evidence Package · PG-D
ID CH-021.1.2.2 · Five-folder knowledge slots (5 folders)
PACKAGE SCOPE
Assembles the methods of implementation and the observable consequences of “The Sino-Japanese Treaty of Peace and Friendship” — harm to life and liberty, loss of property and opportunity, costs to society and its institutions, the parties who profited, and the chains of command and of responsibility — setting side by side the official explanation, differing studies, counter-evidence, and comparative material. For entries that involve no direct bodily harm, fields such as deaths and detentions are not applied mechanically.
Assembles the methods of implementation and the observable consequences of “The Sino-Japanese Treaty of Peace and Friendship” — harm to life and liberty, loss of property and opportunity, costs to society and its institutions, the parties who profited, and the chains of command and of responsibility — setting side by side the official explanation, differing studies, counter-evidence, and comparative material. For entries that involve no direct bodily harm, fields such as deaths and detentions are not applied mechanically.
Five folders
🗄 CH-021.1.2.2.01 21-1-2-2-1 Factual timeline; places; persons and institutions; policies and orders; and a core summary
🗄 CH-021.1.2.2.02 21-1-2-2-2 Victims’ accounts; consequences of the conduct; and the chains of profit, command, and responsibility
🗄 CH-021.1.2.2.03 21-1-2-2-3 Original documents, archival data, images, audio, video, and web-page archives
🗄 CH-021.1.2.2.04 21-1-2-2-4 Provenance and version, chain of custody, reliability grade, AI verification, human review, and disputed counter-evidence
🗄 CH-021.1.2.2.05 21-1-2-2-5 Authorial argument, database judgment, institutional comparison, policy and law, and applications for public communication 21-1-3
On this record:
💬 Comment⚖ Judge★ Rate＋ Corroborate✕ Rebut✎ CorrectRatings use the ten-dimension rubric with human sign-off. Comments, judgments, corroborations, rebuttals, and corrections first receive a receipt and enter the pending queue; they are stored only after review (never written directly to the official database — Red Line 1).