28-11-4 Distinguishing Among Political Appeals, Abstract Advocacy, Imminent Incitement, True Threats, and Criminal Recruitment Item · PG-C
ID CH-028.11.4 · This item: 2 packages, five fixed folders each.
It establishes an editorial review checklist: whether the content points to a specific unlawful act, whether it calls for immediate execution, whether it designates targets and methods, whether it has a realistic possibility of producing action, whether it threatens death or injury, and whether it is coordinated with a criminal organization. The closer it comes to specificity, immediacy, and executability, the higher the threshold for publication. LEGAL / SAFETY REVIEW. The official website should establish processes for automatic interception, human escalation, deletion appeals, emergency risk handling, and lawyer review.
Knowledge packages
📦 CH-028.11.4.1 28-11-4-1 Distinguishing Among Political Appeals, Abstract Advocacy, Imminent Incitement, True Threats, and Criminal Recruitment: Sources of Law, Comparative Experience, Institutional Proposals, and Public Materials
5 folders
📦 CH-028.11.4.2 28-11-4-2 Distinguishing Among Political Appeals, Abstract Advocacy, Imminent Incitement, True Threats, and Criminal Recruitment: Conditions of Implementation, Worst-Case Scenarios, Oversight and Error Correction, and Democratic Authorization
Ratings use the ten-dimension rubric with human sign-off. Comments, judgments, corroborations, rebuttals, and corrections first receive a receipt and enter the pending queue; they are stored only after review (never written directly to the official database — Red Line 1).