28-9-1 Distinguishing Among Existing Unjust Laws, Basic Human Rights, and Democratic Legitimacy Item · PG-C
ID CH-028.9.1 · This item: 2 packages, five fixed folders each.
It distinguishes the prohibitions of the CCP’s current law, constitutional declarations, international human-rights norms, and future democratic authorization, explaining that peaceful assembly, association, strikes, disseminating facts, and demanding a change of government may be criminalized by the authorities yet do not thereby automatically lose their political and moral legitimacy. CONCEPTUAL / DESIGN DISPUTES. The word “lawful” must specify which jurisdiction, which period, and what standard of legitimacy is meant.
Knowledge packages
📦 CH-028.9.1.1 28-9-1-1 Distinguishing Among Existing Unjust Laws, Basic Human Rights, and Democratic Legitimacy: Sources of Law, Comparative Experience, Institutional Proposals, and Public Materials
5 folders
📦 CH-028.9.1.2 28-9-1-2 Distinguishing Among Existing Unjust Laws, Basic Human Rights, and Democratic Legitimacy: Conditions of Implementation, Worst-Case Scenarios, Oversight and Error Correction, and Democratic Authorization
Ratings use the ten-dimension rubric with human sign-off. Comments, judgments, corroborations, rebuttals, and corrections first receive a receipt and enter the pending queue; they are stored only after review (never written directly to the official database — Red Line 1).